The Commitment Test

I’m walking 80 miles from Oxford to Birmingham Children’s Hospital for Kit, a young boy battling neuroblastoma. None of us are expert walkers. Here’s what committing to hard things reveals about business strategy.

In a couple of days, I’ll be attempting something I’ve never done before: walking 80 miles from Oxford to Birmingham Children’s Hospital. Not for a personal challenge or Instagram content, but for Kit - a young boy fighting neuroblastoma, one of the most aggressive childhood cancers. None of our team are experienced walkers. Certainly not athletes.

Only 40% of people who sign up for charity challenges actually complete them. Training requires 6-8 weeks minimum preparation. The average person walks 3-4 miles per day. We’ll need to average 26+ miles per day over three days. Most business leaders won’t commit to strategies this demanding.

The Strategic Paradox: Why Leaders Avoid Real Commitment Tests

Business leaders talk constantly about commitment. Commitment to growth targets, commitment to transformation initiatives, commitment to customer excellence. But these commitments come with escape routes: market conditions change, priorities shift, boards redirect strategy. Real commitment has no exit clause.

Walking 80 miles for Kit isn’t a business strategy I can pivot from when it gets uncomfortable. I can’t delegate the miles to my team or outsource the physical discomfort to a consultant. The commitment is binary: complete it or fail publicly. This clarity is something most business commitments deliberately avoid.

The discomfort reveals the difference between strategic commitments and strategic preferences. Preferences change when circumstances become difficult. Commitments persist precisely because circumstances become difficult. Kit’s fight against cancer doesn’t pause for more convenient timing.

Three Strategic Lessons from Committing to Hard Things

1. Commit in public

Announcing the walk publicly created an accountability structure that makes retreat impossible without reputational damage. This is the same mechanism that makes bold strategic announcements effective - they force organisational follow-through by making failure visible to stakeholders who matter.

The moment I announced this walk, retreat became exponentially more difficult than completion. Public commitments eliminate the option of quiet strategic pivots that plague most business initiatives. When stakeholders know what you’ve committed to, backing down requires explaining failure, not just changing direction.

This is why Amazon’s Jeff Bezos made bold public predictions about AWS growth, and why Elon Musk announces impossible production timelines for Tesla. Public commitment creates organisational momentum that private strategies cannot generate. The fear of public failure often exceeds the fear of private effort.

2. Time Scarcity Forces Prioritisation Clarity

Fitting daily training walks into a full consulting schedule revealed what actually matters versus what feels urgent. Client calls that seemed unmovable suddenly became moveable when faced with the reality of physical preparation requirements. Real constraints force authentic priority decisions.

The training schedule eliminated every non-essential commitment from my calendar. Optional meetings, “quick catch-ups” - all disappeared when confronted with the binary choice between preparation and social convenience. Strategic focus emerges naturally when the alternative is public failure.

3. Shared Suffering Builds Team Cohesion

Training walks with the team create bonds that boardroom discussions cannot replicate. Sharing physical discomfort, problem-solving together through fatigue, supporting each other through difficult miles - these experiences build trust faster than trust-building exercises ever could.

The walk will demand collective resilience when individual motivation fails. Business teams that experience real shared challenges together perform differently than teams that only share quarterly targets. Kit’s story gives our suffering context and meaning that profit targets simply cannot provide.

What Choosing Discomfort Reveals About Leadership Authenticity

The charity walk forces a question most business leaders never confront: what are you willing to suffer for beyond your own advancement? Kit’s neuroblastoma battle puts every business challenge in perspective. Quarterly targets feel manageable when compared to what this young boy faces every day.

Authentic leadership emerges when leaders choose discomfort for purposes beyond personal benefit. Teams follow leaders who demonstrate commitment to something larger than quarterly performance. The walk doesn’t improve my consulting business, but it demonstrates the kind of person I am when nobody’s measuring my performance.

Organisations with leaders who regularly choose difficult, unrewarded commitments build cultures that exceed expectations. When teams observe leaders taking on challenges that provide no business benefit, they understand what real commitment looks like. This cultural understanding translates into higher performance when business challenges demand extraordinary effort.

The 80-mile walk from Oxford to Birmingham Children’s Hospital isn’t about proving anything to my business network or generating content for Problem Hacker newsletters. It’s about showing up when it matters, in a way that requires real sacrifice rather than convenient gestures.

But the strategic lessons are undeniable. Real commitment looks different from business commitment. It demands public stakes, accepts no exit strategy, requires systematic preparation, and builds the kind of character that transforms how you approach every other challenge in your professional life.

Sometimes the most important strategic development happens when strategy isn’t the point at all.

---

Please donate here: https://www.gofundme.com/f/Help-little-kit-fight-neuroblastoma-please-donate

Read more about our challenge here: https://steppingupforkit.com/